Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.

Fourth Circuit

Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.

471 F. App'x 189

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2012·No. No. 11-2395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067CMH-IDD, 2011 WL 4961961 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067CMH-IDD, 2011 WL 4961961 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co., 471 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

471 F. App'x 189 (Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.