Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.

Fourth Circuit

Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.

471 F. App'x 189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 24, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2395

StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 189 (Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tamar v. Geico Casualty Co., 471 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067CMH-IDD, 2011 WL 4961961 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067CMH-IDD, 2011 WL 4961961 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamar-v-geico-casualty-co-ca4-2012.