Tamale v. Regents of the University of California
498 U.S. 1033, 111 S. Ct. 693, 112 L. Ed. 2d 683, 59 U.S.L.W. 3461, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 230
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1991·No. No. 90-6117·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tamale v. Regents of the University of California, 498 U.S. 1033, 111 S. Ct. 693, 112 L. Ed. 2d 683, 59 U.S.L.W. 3461, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 230 (1991).
498 U.S. 1033 (Tamale v. Regents of the University of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Terry v. Cross
112 F. Supp. 2d 543 (E.D. Virginia, 2000)
Green v. French
978 F. Supp. 242 (E.D. North Carolina, 1997)
Thomas-Bey v. Smith
869 F. Supp. 1214 (D. Maryland, 1994)
Smith v. Dixon
14 F.3d 956 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Kermit Smith, Jr. v. Gary Dixon, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Kermit Smith, Jr. v. Gary Dixon, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
996 F.2d 667 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Frank R. Nickerson v. T.A. Lee Attorney General of North Carolina
971 F.2d 1125 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)
Syvasky Lafayette Poyner v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, (Six Cases)
964 F.2d 1404 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)
Pruett v. Thompson
771 F. Supp. 1428 (E.D. Virginia, 1991)