Tamala Janeka Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tamala Janeka Jackson v. State

DecidedMarch 20, 2002

Docket04-02-00105-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Tamala Janeka Jackson v. State (Tamala Janeka Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tamala Janeka Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 04-02-00105-CR

Tamala Janeka JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-CR-5619

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Alma L. López, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2002

DISMISSED

The defendant, Tamala Janeka Jackson, filed a general notice of appeal to complain of a conviction based on a plea of nolo contendere. The punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the defendant. The trial court did not grant defendant permission to appeal.

Because defendant's notice of appeal does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(b)(3), this court does not have jurisdiction to consider defendant's complaints on appeal. White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAMDO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI