TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2016

Docket2016 NYSlipOp 51327(U)

StatusPublished

This text of TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Clifton Carr, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered February 25, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Metro Health Prods., Inc. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (49 Misc 3d 130[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51419[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: September 15, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI