Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
This text of Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered July 26, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. By order entered July 26, 2013, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.
For the reasons stated in Renelique, as Assignee of Allen Haynes v Travelers Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ______ [appeal No. 2013-1747 Q C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: June 06, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tam-med-supply-corp-v-new-york-cent-mut-fire-ins-co-nyappterm-2016.