Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 3, 2017·No. 2017 NYSlipOp 51505(U)·Published

Opinion



Tam Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Turner, Kimberly, Appellant,

against

Ameriprise Auto & Home, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damien J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, LLP (Mitchell L. Kaufman, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered September 9, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.

For the reasons stated in Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2014-2172 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 03, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home (Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.