Talty v. Talty
This text of 110 A.D.3d 908 (Talty v. Talty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Greenberg, J.), dated November 29, 2012, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated August 20, 2012, which denied her motion for an award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $41,468.25.
Ordered that the order dated November 29, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.
Under the particular circumstances of this case, including the financial circumstances of the parties, and the relative merit of the parties’ positions in connection with the mother’s unsuccessful petition for an upward modification of the father’s maintenance obligation, the denial of the mother’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $41,468.25 was a provident exercise of discretion (see DeCobrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]; Matter of Alexander v Strathairn, 69 AD3d 930 [2010]).
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.3d 908, 972 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talty-v-talty-nyappdiv-2013.