Talton v. Warden, State Prison
636 A.2d 850, 228 Conn. 919, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 28
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 13, 1994
DocketSC 14874
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 636 A.2d 850 (Talton v. Warden, State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Talton v. Warden, State Prison, 636 A.2d 850, 228 Conn. 919, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 28 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The petitioner Napier Talton’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 171 (AC 11055), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that, based on the record of the habeas proceeding, the habeas court properly determined that the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was not credible?
“2. If the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was not credible, did the Appellate Court properly decline to find that the appellant’s due process rights were violated?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant failed to establish that he was fatally prejudiced by his trial counsel’s arguably deficient performance and therefore that he was not denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Talton v. Warden
648 A.2d 876 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Johnson v. State
647 A.2d 373 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
636 A.2d 850, 228 Conn. 919, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talton-v-warden-state-prison-conn-1994.