Talman v. Hawkins

703 So. 2d 517, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14373, 1998 WL 25737
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 24, 1997
DocketNo. 97-3551
StatusPublished

This text of 703 So. 2d 517 (Talman v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talman v. Hawkins, 703 So. 2d 517, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14373, 1998 WL 25737 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We redesignate the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as an appeal of a non-final order under rule 9.130(a)(4), Florida Rules Appellate Procedure. See Berman v. Berman, 591 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We summarily affirm the trial court’s ruling pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules Appellate Procedure. This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s seeking other appropriate relief in the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berman v. Berman
591 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
703 So. 2d 517, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14373, 1998 WL 25737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talman-v-hawkins-fladistctapp-1997.