Talmadge v. Seymour
146 S.E. 473, 167 Ga. 601, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 2
Opinion
Inasmuch as the provisions in the act of the legislature providing for the appointment of fertilizer inspectors, their duties, compensation, etc., approved August 19, 1912 (Georgia Laws 1912, p. 52), are the same both for the “general inspectors” and the “short-term inspectors,” in so far as they relate to the term for which the appointees shall be commissioned and the grounds upon which they may be “discharged, ” this ease is controlled by the decisions in Talmadge v. Cordell, ante, and Talmadge v. McDonald, ante.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talmadge v. Seymour, 146 S.E. 473, 167 Ga. 601, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 2 (Ga. 1929).
146 S.E. 473 (Talmadge v. Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Surety Co. v. Seymour
166 S.E. 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Talmadge v. Seymour
156 S.E. 658 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)