Talmadge v. Northrop

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Talmadge v. Northrop

1 Root 454

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedAugust 15, 1792

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 454 (Talmadge v. Northrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talmadge v. Northrop, 1 Root 454 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

He cannot be a witness. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and £60 8s. 5d. damages.

The defendant moved in arrest of judgment- — That Jonathan Wright one of the jurors who tried said cause had a similar demand upon the defendant with the plaintiff, for two horses sold on said Bishop about the same time, on credit, which went in the same drove, and were shipped in the same vessel, and was waiting to see the event of this suit, of which the defendant was wholly ignorant, when said jury were impaneled. Demurrer.

Judgment — Motion in arrest sufficient, and a repleader ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

He cannot be a witness. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and £60 8s. 5d. damages.

The defendant moved in arrest of judgment- — That Jonathan Wright one of the jurors who tried said cause had a similar demand upon the defendant with the plaintiff, for two horses sold on said Bishop about the same time, on credit, which went in the same drove, and were shipped in the same vessel, and was waiting to see the event of this suit, of which the defendant was wholly ignorant, when said jury were impaneled. Demurrer.

Judgment — Motion in arrest sufficient, and a repleader ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talmadge-v-northrop-conn-1792.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack