Talmadge v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
This text of 107 A. 411 (Talmadge v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case of Winfield v. Erie Railroad Co., 88 N. J. L. 619, upon which the Supreme Court based its decision, was later overruled by the Supreme Court of the United States in Erie Railroad Co. v. Winfield, 244 U. S. 170; 61 L. Ed. [506]*5061057. This decision is controlling and requires a reversal of the judgment of our Supreme Court, which is ordered accordingly.
For affirmance — ISTone.
For reversal — The Chancellor., Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 9.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A. 411, 93 N.J.L. 505, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talmadge-v-new-york-susquehanna-western-railroad-nj-1919.