Talmadge v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
107 A. 411, 93 N.J.L. 505, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 196
Opinion
The case of Winfield v. Erie Railroad Co., 88 N. J. L. 619, upon which the Supreme Court based its decision, was later overruled by the Supreme Court of the United States in Erie Railroad Co. v. Winfield, 244 U. S. 170; 61 L. Ed. [506]*5061057. This decision is controlling and requires a reversal of the judgment of our Supreme Court, which is ordered accordingly.
For affirmance — ISTone.
For reversal — The Chancellor., Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 9.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talmadge v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad, 107 A. 411, 93 N.J.L. 505, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 196 (N.J. 1919).
107 A. 411 (Talmadge v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erie Railroad Company v. Winfield
244 U.S. 170 (Supreme Court, 1916)