Talmadge v. Myers
This text of 146 S.E. 472 (Talmadge v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This ease is controlled by the rulings in Talmadge v. Cordell, ante. It follows that the judgment in the main bill of exceptions is affirmed; and that the judgment in the cross-bill of exceptions is reversed in so far as it provided, after sustaining the plaintiff’s de[601]*601murrer to the answer of the defendant, that the matters therein set up could be considered upon the issues whether the defendant acted in good faith in the premises, and whether the plaintiff was barred by laches.
Judgment affirmed on the main Mil of exceptions, and affirmed in part and reversed in part on the eross-Mll.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 S.E. 472, 167 Ga. 600, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talmadge-v-myers-ga-1928.