Tally v. State
751 So. 2d 152, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 695, 2000 WL 63140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 2000·No. No. 1D99-2748·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find that appellant’s motion for rehearing of the order denying his 3.850 motion for postconviction relief was timely, contrary to the circuit court’s determination. See King v. State, 504 So.2d 405, 406-07 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We are unable to say that the motion for rehearing was altogether frivolous as the motion may have pointed out things the trial court overlooked, although we make no intimations in this regard. Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motion for rehearing is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tally v. State, 751 So. 2d 152, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 695, 2000 WL 63140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
751 So. 2d 152 (Tally v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hagerman v. Hagerman
751 So. 2d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)