Tallulah Falls Railway Co v. Davis

105 S.E. 712, 26 Ga. App. 215, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 75
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1921·No. 11336·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The measure of damages recoverable in a suit brought under the Federal employer’s liability act being only the amount the deceased, if he had ndt died, would have contributed to his legal beneficiaries (the plaintiff and her child in the instant case), it was reversible error for the court to instruct the jury as follows: “ If entitled to recover anything, it should be such an amount as would he a fair cash equivalent of his full yearly earning capacity when he lost his life, payable in annual installments until his death. ”

2. Although elsewhere in his charge, but not in direct connection with the above excerpt, the judge correctly instructed the jury upon this subject, it cannot, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, be held that the erroneous charge was harmless error, since it was never specifically retracted.

3. After a careful examination of the several assignments of error, the above ruling deals with the only complaint that contains reversible error. ' • >

-Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., eoncws. Broyles, G. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tallulah Falls Railway Co v. Davis, 105 S.E. 712, 26 Ga. App. 215, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 75 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

105 S.E. 712 (Tallulah Falls Railway Co v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Highway Department v. Hilliard
145 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Johnson v. Roberson
77 S.E.2d 232 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Gay v. Hurst
155 S.E. 346 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Solomon
141 S.E. 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Tallulah Falls Railway Co. v. Davis
111 S.E. 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)