Tallmadge v. Wallis

1 How. Pr. 100
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 How. Pr. 100 (Tallmadge v. Wallis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tallmadge v. Wallis, 1 How. Pr. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Nelson, Chief Justice.

Held, that the condition of the bond should have required the obligors to pay on demand all costs, &c. The plaintiff being a non-resident, the defendants were not bound to seek him out to demand the costs of him.

Decision.—Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montague v. Bassett
18 Abb. Pr. 13 (New York Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallmadge-v-wallis-nysupct-1845.