Tallmadge v. Tallmadge

2 Barb. Ch. 290
New York Court of Chancery·Decided April 7, 1847·Published

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The complainant having examined Mr. Tallmadge as a witness, the defendant Cushman had a right to .cross-examine him, as a matter of course, and without an order to that effect. If he was examined as a party merely, he could only be examined as against himself, and could not be cross-examined by his own counsel. But if his testimony can, by any possibility, affect the rights of Cushman, he is made a witness in the cause, and consequently Cushman has a right to «cross-examine him.

-Order according to prayer of petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tallmadge v. Tallmadge, 2 Barb. Ch. 290 (N.Y. 1847).

2 Barb. Ch. 290 (Tallmadge v. Tallmadge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.