Tallmadge v. Stockholm
14 Johns. 342
Opinion
We have, from time to time, gradually the practice, as to setting aside a default for want of a plea; we have now come to the general rule, that a default for want of a plea, though regularly entered, will be set aside, in every case, on the payment of costs, where there is an of merits, and no trial has been lost. The payment of costs is a sufficient penalty on the defendant for neglecting to plead. We grant the motion, therefore, on payment of costs.
Rule granted.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tallmadge v. Stockholm, 14 Johns. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).
14 Johns. 342 (Tallmadge v. Stockholm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griswold Linseed Oil Co. v. Lee
47 N.W. 955 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
Security Bank v. National Bank of the Commonwealth
48 How. Pr. 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)
Hand v. Yahoola Min. Co.
11 F. Cas. 419 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Georgia, 1873)
Quinn v. Case
2 Hilt. 467 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1859)