Tallmadge v. Kirk

Illinois Supreme Court

Tallmadge v. Kirk

20 Ill. 600

DecidedApril 15, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ill. 600 (Tallmadge v. Kirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tallmadge v. Kirk, 20 Ill. 600 (Ill. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

This case is brought here by writ of error, by Tallmadge, upon the same record upon which the appeal was taken, in the case of Ferguson et al. v, Tallmadge, decided at this term, for the purpose of reversing that portion of the decree by which the bill was dismissed as to Kirk and Smith, two of the original defendants. So far from the court having erred in dismissing the bill, as to these defendants, we have in the case referred to, decided that it should have dismissed the bill as to all of the defendants. What has been there said is sufficient for both cases.

The decree must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caton, C. J.

This case is brought here by writ of error, by Tallmadge, upon the same record upon which the appeal was taken, in the case of Ferguson et al. v, Tallmadge, decided at this term, for the purpose of reversing that portion of the decree by which the bill was dismissed as to Kirk and Smith, two of the original defendants. So far from the court having erred in dismissing the bill, as to these defendants, we have in the case referred to, decided that it should have dismissed the bill as to all of the defendants. What has been there said is sufficient for both cases.

The decree must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ill. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallmadge-v-kirk-ill-1858.