Tallion Kyle Taylor v. State
This text of Tallion Kyle Taylor v. State (Tallion Kyle Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00077-CR
Tallion Kyle Taylor, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 15-2925-K368, THE HONORABLE LLOYD DOUGLAS SHAVER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The State has filed a motion to abate this appeal to allow the trial court to rule on
the State’s “Motion to Continue Recusal of the Williamson County District Attorney’s Office
and Appoint District Attorney Pro Tem.” The State explains in the motion to abate that
Abel Reyna, then District Attorney of McLennan County, and his assistants were previously
appointed as District Attorneys Pro Tem for the prosecution of this case through appeal after the
Williamson County District Attorney’s Office recused itself from the prosecution of this matter.
Since the original appointment, Barry Johnson has replaced Abel Reyna as the District Attorney
of McLennan County. That office has informed the Williamson County District Attorney’s
Office that the McLennan County District Attorney’s Office is willing to continue the appointment for the purpose of this appeal, but that it requires an order specifically appointing
Mr. Johnson.
The Court has received a supplemental record containing the State’s “Motion to
Continue Recusal of the Williamson County District Attorney’s Office and Appoint District
Attorney Pro Tem,” which the State filed with the trial court on the same day that it filed its
motion to abate in this Court, and an order granting that motion, which was signed by the
presiding judge of the 368th District Court of Williamson County, the Honorable Rick J. Kennon.
However, both the record and the State’s motion to continue recusal reflect that Judge Kennon
has recused himself from this case, and therefore, he can take no action in it. The appeal is
abated and remanded to the trial court (1) to allow the Williamson County District Attorney to
file its motion to continue recusal and (2) to allow the trial court judge who is currently sitting by
assignment to rule on the State’s motion. The trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental
clerk’s record, including the order on the motion to continue recusal and to appoint Mr. Johnson,
to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than June 10, 2019.
It is so ordered May 31, 2019.
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Abated and Remanded
Filed: May 31, 2019
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tallion Kyle Taylor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallion-kyle-taylor-v-state-texapp-2019.