Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator & Heirs

39 Ky. 331, 9 Dana 331, 1840 Ky. LEXIS 25
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 6, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 39 Ky. 331 (Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator & Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator & Heirs, 39 Ky. 331, 9 Dana 331, 1840 Ky. LEXIS 25 (Ky. Ct. App. 1840).

Opinion

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

John King executed to George C. Talliaferro, the following note:—

“For value received, I promise to pay to George C. Talliaferro, six hundred dollars, on or before the 29th day of June, 1829; yet it is understood that the interest is to be paid at the end of each year; as witness my hand this 29th day of June, 1822.”

And the only question is whether interest should be allowed upon the sums stipulated to be paid in interest, from the end of each year, when the same fell due.

The interest, by the terms of the covenant, is made payable at the end of each year, and is as much then demandable, as if a specific sum equal to the amount of interest had been promised, and in default of payment, as much entitles the plaintiff to demand interest upon the amount so due and unpaid. The fact that the amount so promised to be paid, is described as interest accruing upon a larger sum, which is made payable at a future day, cannot the less entitle the plaintiff to demand interest upon the amount, in default of payment, as a just remuneration in damages for the detention or non-payment.

It is, therefore, the opinion of the Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and cause remanded, that judgment may be rendered according to the principles here indicated; and the plaintiff in error is entitled to his costs in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Liquidation of the Chinese American Bank
36 Haw. 571 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1943)
McWilliams v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.
147 S.W.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1940)
Pensacola & Atlantic Railroad v. Hilton's Trustee
144 S.W. 1077 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Burke v. Trabue's Extx.
126 S.W. 125 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1910)
Levens v. Briggs
14 L.R.A. 188 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)
Mt. Mansfield Hotel Co. v. Bailey
64 Vt. 151 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1891)
Colcored v. Arnold's Committee
10 Ky. Op. 100 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1878)
Radford v. Southern Mutual Life Ins.
75 Ky. 434 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)
Wheaton v. Pike
9 R.I. 132 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1868)
Doe v. Vallejo
29 Cal. 385 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Cox v. Smith
1 Nev. 161 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Ky. 331, 9 Dana 331, 1840 Ky. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talliaferros-executors-v-kings-administrator-heirs-kyctapp-1840.