Talley v. United States
This text of 159 F.2d 703 (Talley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Convicted on three counts of an indictment charging him with unlawful dealings with marihuana, defendant has appealed from the judgment and sentence. One error only is assigned, that the evidence upon which he was convicted was obtained by an unlawful search and seizure, and the court erred in denying his motion to suppress it. In Cannon v. United States of America, 158 F.2d 952, this court had recent occasion to deal with motions to suppress evidence for illegal search and seizure of marihuana. It there sustained the finding of the trial court, that the search was reasonable, on evidence much less convincing than that in the case at bar. Here there was advance information sufficient in itself to justify the search, but, more than that, there was actual evidence of conduct, including flight, transpiring in the presence of the officers, which gave fuller justification to all that they did. The motion to suppress the evidence was correctly denied. The judgment was right. It is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 F.2d 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talley-v-united-states-ca5-1947.