Talley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Talley v. State

19 S.E.2d 816, 67 Ga. App. 279, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 375

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1942·No. 29408.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of maintaining a disorderly house. The evidence for the State, while rather weak, authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence. He made a statement to the jury which was evidently rejected by them. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court can not interfere. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., eoncur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of maintaining a disorderly house. The evidence for the State, while rather weak, authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence. He made a statement to the jury which was evidently rejected by them. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court can not interfere. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., eoncur.

Talley v. State, 19 S.E.2d 816, 67 Ga. App. 279, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 375 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

19 S.E.2d 816 (Talley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.