Talley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Talley v. State

19 S.E.2d 816, 67 Ga. App. 279, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 375

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1942

Docket29408.

StatusPublished

This text of 19 S.E.2d 816 (Talley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talley v. State, 19 S.E.2d 816, 67 Ga. App. 279, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 375 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of maintaining a disorderly house. The evidence for the State, while rather weak, authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence. He made a statement to the jury which was evidently rejected by them. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court can not interfere. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., eoncur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of maintaining a disorderly house. The evidence for the State, while rather weak, authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence. He made a statement to the jury which was evidently rejected by them. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court can not interfere. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., eoncur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 S.E.2d 816, 67 Ga. App. 279, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talley-v-state-gactapp-1942.