Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Talley v. State

Talley v. State

58 S.E. 667, 2 Ga. App. 395, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 389
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1907
Docket537
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 58 S.E. 667 (Talley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talley v. State, 58 S.E. 667, 2 Ga. App. 395, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 389 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. While section 1017 of the Penal Code gives the right to the State and the accused to have the witnesses of the other examined out of the hearing of each other, and directs that “the court shall take proper care to effect this object so far as practicable and convenient,” yet this matter is within the discretion of the court, and its exercise will not be controlled unless manifestly abused.

2. Where the court, at the request of the solicitor and over the objection of the defendant, permitted a witness for the State to remai^ in court and assist in the prosecution, and said witness was first examined, there was no abuse of discretion.

3. The evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stuart v. State
180 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Hall v. Hall
141 S.E.2d 400 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Jones v. State
44 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E. 667, 2 Ga. App. 395, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talley-v-state-gactapp-1907.