Talley v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Talley v. Matthews

99 S.E. 315, 23 Ga. App. 748, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 331

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1919

Docket10131

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 315 (Talley v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talley v. Matthews, 99 S.E. 315, 23 Ga. App. 748, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The court did not err in dismissing the petition on general demurrer.

2. As this ruling controls the case, it is unnecessary to consider the judgment overruling the special demurrers.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

The defendant demurred generally and specially, contending that the petition was an attempt to modify, add to, or alter by oral testimony the written contract by which the bond for title was transferred to the defendant. The court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition, and the plaintiff excepted.'

Hill & Adams, for plaintiff, cited:

Civil Code (1910), §§ 4179, 4188, 5736, 5789, 4268 (1), 3901; 128 Ga. 180; 138 Ga. 233; 134 Ga. 704; 106 Ga. 327; 72 Ga. 69; Id. 713; 67 Ga. 448,

Green, Tilson & McKinney, for defendant, cited:

146 Ga. 824; 147 Ga. 185, 189 (2); 5 Ga. App. 226; 81 Ga. 808 (4); 112 Ga.' 199 (6), 210 (6-7).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI