Talley v. Jonas
This text of Talley v. Jonas (Talley v. Jonas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2041
BETTYANN L. TALLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NANCY D. JONAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-612-9-8)
Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: November 22, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy D. Jonas, Appellant Pro Se. Bettyann L. Talley, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Nancy D. Jonas appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Talley v. Jonas, No. CA-00-612-9-8
(D.S.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Talley v. Jonas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talley-v-jonas-ca4-2004.