Talley v. Jonas

Fourth Circuit

Talley v. Jonas

114 F. App'x 560

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2004·No. No. 04-2041·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nancy D. Jonas appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Talley v. Jonas, No. CA-00-612-9-8 (D.S.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [561]*561and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nancy D. Jonas appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Talley v. Jonas, No. CA-00-612-9-8 (D.S.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [561]*561and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Talley v. Jonas, 114 F. App'x 560 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

114 F. App'x 560 (Talley v. Jonas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.