Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Talley v. Crosby

Talley v. Crosby

888 So. 2d 708, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18294, 2004 WL 2903874
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-1734
StatusPublished

This text of 888 So. 2d 708 (Talley v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talley v. Crosby, 888 So. 2d 708, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18294, 2004 WL 2903874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the circuit court proceeding was concluded on grounds other than the merits, we sua sponte treat the petition for certiorari as an appeal from the circuit court’s order. See Green v. Moore, 777 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The circuit court’s order transferring the petition for writ of mandamus is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED with directions to proceed to a disposition on the merits of the petition for mandamus. See Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Moore
777 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Burgess v. Crosby
870 So. 2d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Davidson v. Crosby
883 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 So. 2d 708, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18294, 2004 WL 2903874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talley-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2004.