Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Talley v. BCI Coca-cola Bottling

Talley v. BCI Coca-cola Bottling

60 P.3d 581, 185 Or. App. 521, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Talley v. BCI Coca-cola Bottling. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 Or. App. 129 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 26, 2002·No. 96-09870; A113826·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent BCI Coca-Cola Bottling has filed a petition for reconsideration of our opinion holding that the Workers’ Compensation Board Hearings Division has jurisdiction over claimant’s request for hearing and reversing and remanding the case. Talley v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling, 184 Or App 129, 55 P3d 558 (2002). We allow the petition and write to clarify that the narrow holding of our opinion is that the board’s Hearings Division has jurisdiction to consider claimant’s request for hearing as a matter concerning a claim.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion clarified and adhered to as clarified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talley v. BCI Coca-cola Bottling, 60 P.3d 581, 185 Or. App. 521, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1985 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

60 P.3d 581 (Talley v. BCI Coca-cola Bottling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Talley v. BCI Coca Cola Bottling
55 P.3d 558 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)