Talley & Baugham, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

198 N.C. 492
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 19, 1930·Published

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The plaintiff, having offered evidence tending to show that the defendant omitted and neglected to transport the shipment in question within the “ordinary time required” (Stone v. R. R., 144 N. C., 220, 56 S. E., 932), and damage resulting therefrom, was entitled to go to the jury. Jenkins v. R. R., 146 N. C., 178, 59 S. E., 663; Meredith v. R. R., 137 N. C., 478, 50 S. E., 1.

The case of Shaw v. Express Co., 171 N. C., 216, 88 S. E., 222, strongly relied upon by the defendant, is neither controlling nor in point, as the facts of that case readily distinguish it from the one at bar.

The deductible time allowed by C. S., 3516, in computing “reasonable time,” to wit, “two days at the initial point and forty-eight hours at one intermediate 'point for each hundred miles distance or fraction thereof,” applies to actions brought to recover the penalty given by said section and fixing the amount thereof, and not to actions for damages only, such as we have in the instant case. Jenkins v. R. R., supra.

There was no error in submitting the case to the jury.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talley & Baugham, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 198 N.C. 492 (N.C. 1930).

198 N.C. 492 (Talley & Baugham, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
56 S.E. 932 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.
59 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
Shaw v. Southern Express Co.
88 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Meredith v. Railroad
50 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)