Talleres Ulma, S.C.I. v. Guerra

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Talleres Ulma, S.C.I. v. Guerra

523 So. 2d 1280, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1756, 1988 WL 40518

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2527

StatusPublished

This text of 523 So. 2d 1280 (Talleres Ulma, S.C.I. v. Guerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talleres Ulma, S.C.I. v. Guerra, 523 So. 2d 1280, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1756, 1988 WL 40518 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellees signed drafts which on their face showed a corporate obligation as individuals. The trial court entered a summary final judgment finding in effect that the appellees intended to sign in a representative capacity. We hold that the trial court erred in entering such a summary judgment, as generally the intention of the parties to an agreement is an issue of fact. Whittimore v. Cruce, 479 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Pollock v. Albertson’s, Inc., 458 So.2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Sanders v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company, 392 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Therefore the summary judgment under review be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for trial on the issues.¹

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellees signed drafts which on their face showed a corporate obligation as individuals. The trial court entered a summary final judgment finding in effect that the appellees intended to sign in a representative capacity. We hold that the trial court erred in entering such a summary judgment, as generally the intention of the parties to an agreement is an issue of fact. Whittimore v. Cruce, 479 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Pollock v. Albertson’s, Inc., 458 So.2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Sanders v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company, 392 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Therefore the summary judgment under review be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for trial on the issues.¹

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 1280, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1756, 1988 WL 40518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talleres-ulma-sci-v-guerra-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack