Taller v. Taller

42 A.D.2d 791, 346 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 30, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for separation, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 1972, which denied his motion for a protective order vacating plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant before trial. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements against respondent, and motion granted. There is no dispute that plaintiff and her attorneys failed to comply with the notice forwarded by the Clerk-in-Charge of the matrimonial part in January, 1970. Thus, pursuant to the notice, the complaint in the action, commenced in 1961, was automatically dismissed for want of prosecution on March 16, 1970 and the Clerk had the duty to make an appropriate entry without further order of the court (CPLR 3404; see Wheelock v. Wheelock, 4 N Y 2d 706; Levine v. Levy, 29 A D 2d 827). The case has never been restored. Under such circumstances, there being no pending action, respondent’s notice to examine defendant as to his financial condition was without legal cognizance and defendant was entitled to an order of protection. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taller v. Taller, 42 A.D.2d 791, 346 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

42 A.D.2d 791 (Taller v. Taller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chem Construction Corp. v. City of New York
117 Misc. 2d 703 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)