Taller v. Taller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taller v. Taller

22 A.D.2d 932, 255 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2429

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 932 (Taller v. Taller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taller v. Taller, 22 A.D.2d 932, 255 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to enforce a money judgment, the. judgment debtor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, [Kings County, dated May 18, 1964, which infer alia: (1) adjudged him in».contempt of court for willful disobedience of a judicial direction to answer certain questions on his examination by the judgment creditor; and (2) provided that. he .“ may purge himself of said contempt ” [933]*933by appearing before a named Special Referee on a specified date and answering all questions. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. The judgment debtor’s time to purge himself of the contempt by appearing, together with his books and records, before the Special Referee and answering all the questions, as directed by the order, is extended to January 18, 1965 or to such other date as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to enforce a money judgment, the. judgment debtor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, [Kings County, dated May 18, 1964, which infer alia: (1) adjudged him in».contempt of court for willful disobedience of a judicial direction to answer certain questions on his examination by the judgment creditor; and (2) provided that. he .“ may purge himself of said contempt ” [933]*933by appearing before a named Special Referee on a specified date and answering all questions. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. The judgment debtor’s time to purge himself of the contempt by appearing, together with his books and records, before the Special Referee and answering all the questions, as directed by the order, is extended to January 18, 1965 or to such other date as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 932, 255 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taller-v-taller-nyappdiv-1964.