Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc. v. Alexander
This text of 51 So. 3d 644 (Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc. v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court concludes that the defendant’s motion for disqualification, which was based upon comments by the trial judge at a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for sanctions that she had faith “as long as my fingernail” that the defendant had produced documents sought by the plaintiff, was both timely and legally sufficient. See Brown v. St. George Island Ltd., 561 So.2d 253 (Fla.1990); Campbell Soup Co. v. Roberts, 676 So.2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parsons, 644 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We grant the petition for writ of prohibition and remand the cause to the circuit court with directions that the motion for disqualification be granted and a new judge assigned to preside over the cause.
PETITION GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 So. 3d 644, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 417, 2011 WL 198383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallahassee-memorial-healthcare-inc-v-alexander-fladistctapp-2011.