Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Florida

Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant

288 So. 2d 204

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1973

DocketNo. 42998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 So. 2d 204 (Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant, 288 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., and DREW, Justice Retired, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., and DREW, Justice Retired, dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 So. 2d 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallahassee-bank-v-bryant-fla-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack