Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant

288 So. 2d 204
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1973·No. No. 42998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., and DREW, Justice Retired, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant, 288 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1973).

288 So. 2d 204 (Tallahassee Bank v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen United Enterprises v. Special Disability Fund
288 So. 2d 204 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)