Talladega Insurance v. McCullough

42 Ala. 667
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 Ala. 667 (Talladega Insurance v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talladega Insurance v. McCullough, 42 Ala. 667 (Ala. 1868).

Opinion

BYRD, J.

It was erroneous to render judgment by default without mailing the proof of service of the summons and complaint in accordance with the rule laid down in the cases cited. — Bank vs. Walker, Minor, 391 ; Lyon vs. Lorant, 3 Ala. 151; Wetumpka & C. R. R. Co. vs. Cole, 6 Ala. 655; the Oxford Iron Works vs. Spradley, in manuscript.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyett v. Frankfort Chair Co.
44 So. 546 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talladega-insurance-v-mccullough-ala-1868.