Tall v. MV Transportation

512 F. App'x 355
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
DocketNo. 12-2304
StatusPublished

This text of 512 F. App'x 355 (Tall v. MV Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tall v. MV Transportation, 512 F. App'x 355 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging wrongful termination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Tall leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. MV Transp., No. 12-417, 2012 WL 4480720 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F. App'x 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tall-v-mv-transportation-ca4-2013.