Tall v. Credit Protection Association
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ABDOULAYE TALL,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-2196 (JDB) COMCAST OF POTOMAC, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM
The Clerk of Court has entered default against the Credit Protection Association ("CPA").
See Clerk's Entry of Default [Docket Entry 17]. Before the Court is [Docket Entry 22]
Abdoulaye Tall's motion for a default judgment. Upon entry of default, "the defaulting defendant
is deemed to admit every well-pleaded allegation in the complaint." Int'l Painters & Allied
Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. R.W. Amrine Drywall Co., Inc., 239 F. Supp. 2d 26, 30 (D.D.C.
2002). "Although the default establishes a defendant's liability, the court is required to make an
independent determination of the sum to be awarded unless the amount of damages is certain."
Id. Hence, when seeking a default judgment, the plaintiff must prove its entitlement to the
damages or other relief requested. See id. "In ruling on such a motion, the court may rely on
detailed affidavits or documentary evidence to determine the appropriate sum for the default
judgment." Id.
By order issued on August 20, 2010, the Court required Tall to provide by affidavit
sufficient evidence to enable the Court to assess and order appropriate relief. He has responded
to that order by a lengthy memorandum with attachments rather than through an affidavit as instructed. Nonetheless, the Court will enter a default judgment on the basis of the law and the
material Tall as provided.
In his Memorandum Regarding Entitlement to Damages ("Damages Mem."), Tall seeks
actual damages, statutory damages, court costs, attorney's fees and punitive damages on his
claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
(FDCPA), and for defamation. He has provided no documentation or other justification for any
attorney's fees (merely claiming that he incurred $1500 in legal expenses) -- which stands to
reason since he has proceeded pro se in this action. Hence, no attorney's fees will be awarded.
The only court costs relating to this action specified by Tall is the filing fee of $350, to which he
is entitled.
Tall's submission is not of much help in specifying any recoverable actual damages. He
makes general, conclusory assertions with respect to his time and effort spent dealing with this
matter, his difficulty in getting one loan, and the anguish and pain he has suffered. But he has
provided no detail as to any injury, and no account for the Court to quantify any damages.
Armed only with his broad, conclusory claims, the Court is hard pressed to make a specific
determination of an amount to which Tall is entitled. And Tall has provided little support for a
claim of a willful violation by CPA -- indeed, he simply assumes either that CPA's conduct must
have been willful or that the default deems a willful violation to be admitted.1 The Court cannot
conclude, therefore, that willfulness under the relevant statutes is well-pled and hence deemed
admitted by virtue of the default.
1 Tall has not satisfied the requirements and standard for an award of punitive damages and under the circumstances here he is not entitled to any.
-2- It is fair to say, however, that this was not a major statutory violation or defamation of
Tall. The circumstances here amount to no more than what one would expect from this type of
fairly routine credit dispute and collection error. Tall identifies little in the way of consequences
to him before the matter was resolved, and the bill in dispute was quite small. After considering
Tall's damages submission, the relevant law and the entire record, the Court makes an
independent determination that, whether as actual damages for the various claims asserted or as
statutory damages for a willful violation of the FCRA and the FDCPA (or a combination of
both), the proper damages award is $350 in court costs and $1500 in additional damages.
Accordingly, a default judgment in the total amount of $1850 will be entered.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Date: October 29, 2010
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tall v. Credit Protection Association (Tall v. Credit Protection Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.