Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.

160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1189
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 1916
DocketNo. 13793
StatusPublished

This text of 160 P. 754 (Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co., 160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1189 (Wash. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served upon the surety in a costs bond filed by plaintiff in the court below. Defendant-appellant has filed in this court a written waiver of any claim that it might have had upon any contingency against such surety by reason of such bond, and stipulating and agreeing that such bond may be forthwith cancelled and held for naught. The case thus falls within our decision in Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., ante p. 233, 160 Pac. 753. Following that decision, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
160 P. 753 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talkington-v-washington-water-power-co-wash-1916.