Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.

160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Wash. 386
Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 1916·No. No. 13793·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served upon the surety in a costs bond filed by plaintiff in the court below. Defendant-appellant has filed in this court a written waiver of any claim that it might have had upon any contingency against such surety by reason of such bond, and stipulating and agreeing that such bond may be forthwith cancelled and held for naught. The case thus falls within our decision in Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., ante p. 233, 160 Pac. 753. Following that decision, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co., 160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1189 (Wash. 1916).

160 P. 754 (Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
160 P. 753 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)