Talisman Sugar Corp. v. Speidel
303 So. 2d 679
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 1974·No. No. 73-1220·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have reviewed the appellate issues and find that no reversible error has been demonstrated. It is our judgment that the matters of negligence, causation and damages were properly for the jury and its verdict was supported by competent substantial evidence. We do not agree with the assertions of legal errors and, even if they may be deemed to be errors, same were harmless and of no consequence as concerns the outcome of this case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talisman Sugar Corp. v. Speidel, 303 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
303 So. 2d 679 (Talisman Sugar Corp. v. Speidel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harden v. State
303 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)