Taliaferro v. Horde's administrator

1 Va. 242, 1 Rand. 242
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedDecember 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Va. 242 (Taliaferro v. Horde's administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taliaferro v. Horde's administrator, 1 Va. 242, 1 Rand. 242 (Va. 1822).

Opinion

December 6th.

Judge Cabell,

delivered the opinion of the coux t:

The chancellor not having entered up any decree against the appellant, directing him to pay to the appellee, any portion of the i-ent of 600k, which, by the deed of the lGth of December, 1804, he was annually to pay to Mrs. Alexander, during her life; this court will not anticipate the question of his liability to the appellee therefor. The only questions deemed necessary to be decided at present, are those relating to the attachment. The process for contempt lies for disobedience of what is decreed, not for what may be decreed. In this case, it is manifest that the appellant has not refused obedience to any thing that was required of him by the decree. The order awarding the attachment, as also that refusing to set it aside, are therefore reversed with costs, and the attachment set aside, and the cause is remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lancaster v. Wilson
27 Va. 624 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Va. 242, 1 Rand. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taliaferro-v-hordes-administrator-va-1822.