Talia v. Merry

156 A. 892, 130 Me. 414, 1931 Me. LEXIS 100
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 12, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 A. 892 (Talia v. Merry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talia v. Merry, 156 A. 892, 130 Me. 414, 1931 Me. LEXIS 100 (Me. 1931).

Opinion

Sturgis, J.

This is a suit against the defendant for alienating the affections of the plaintiff’s husband. At the close of the evidence, upon motion, the presiding Justice directed a verdict for the defendant. An exception was allowed.

By R. S., Chap. 74, Sec. 7, a married woman may recover damages in an action on the case for the alienation of the affections of her husband or the loss of his aid, comfort and society by any arts, enticements and inducements of another woman more than eighteen years of age.

[415]*415Alienation of affections only is alleged. A detailed statement of the testimony is unnecessary. Giving the most favorable view to the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, a prima facie case of alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s husband may be found. It is settled law that a verdict should not be directed for a defendant if, upon any reasonable view of the testimony, under the law, the plaintiff can recover. Tomlinson v. Clement Bros., 130 Me., 189.

Exception sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jaeger v. Cutting
124 A.2d 749 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1956)
Kimball v. Cummings
68 A.2d 625 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A. 892, 130 Me. 414, 1931 Me. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talia-v-merry-me-1931.