Talevi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Talevi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

10 A.D.2d 839, 199 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 839 (Talevi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talevi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 10 A.D.2d 839, 199 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Implicit in our remand for a new trial, on the prior appeal was a holding that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie ease. On this second trial no less was proven than at the first and thus the dismissal of the complaint at the end of the plaintiffs’ ease was unwarranted. It also appears to be error to have excluded the reports received by the defendant from its recreation area supervisors. The incidents and conduct therein set forth are sufficiently close in time and location as to have probative value with respect to the nature of the notice had by the defendant and the extent of its obligation to supervise as a result thereof. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Implicit in our remand for a new trial, on the prior appeal was a holding that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie ease. On this second trial no less was proven than at the first and thus the dismissal of the complaint at the end of the plaintiffs’ ease was unwarranted. It also appears to be error to have excluded the reports received by the defendant from its recreation area supervisors. The incidents and conduct therein set forth are sufficiently close in time and location as to have probative value with respect to the nature of the notice had by the defendant and the extent of its obligation to supervise as a result thereof. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 839, 199 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talevi-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack