Tales v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tales v. State

108 So. 3d 721, 2013 WL 756354, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-1902

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 3d 721 (Tales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tales v. State, 108 So. 3d 721, 2013 WL 756354, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Vilson H. Tales appeals his convictions and (time served) sentences for two counts of simple battery. Based upon the State’s concession that the dual battery convictions violate double jeopardy, we reverse with directions that the trial court vacate one of those convictions. No other issue merits discussion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

TORPY, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Vilson H. Tales appeals his convictions and (time served) sentences for two counts of simple battery. Based upon the State’s concession that the dual battery convictions violate double jeopardy, we reverse with directions that the trial court vacate one of those convictions. No other issue merits discussion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

TORPY, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 3d 721, 2013 WL 756354, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tales-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.