Talcott v. M'Kibben

2 Mart. 298
Superior Court of Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1812·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This case is not to be compared to that of a reference of accounts. The parties have, by their o~m act, substituted judges of their own choice. They have not required that they should be sworn, and they have given them full powers. By a mutual stipulation, the report which they have made is to be the judgment of the court. Surely, on good ground, the Court would inquire whether there has been any improper conduct; but, in the absence of any suggestion of this kind, there must be judgment according td the report.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talcott v. M'Kibben, 2 Mart. 298 (La. Super. Ct. 1812).

2 Mart. 298 (Talcott v. M'Kibben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guillory Real Estate, Inc. v. Ward
296 So. 2d 853 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
E. v. Benjamin Co. v. Royal Mfg. Co.
136 So. 19 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
Bach v. Slidell
2 La. Ann. 626 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1847)