Talcott v. Cogswell
3 Day 512
Opinion
were of opinion, that the circumstances of the case furnished sufficient evidence that the endorsement was joint; and that each having paid what, in that case, each would be compellable to pay, the verdict ought to be for the defendant. They, therefore, returned the jury to a second, and afterwards to a third consideration; but the jury adhered to their verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talcott v. Cogswell, 3 Day 512 (Colo. Ct. App. 1807).
3 Day 512 (Talcott v. Cogswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jaronko v. Czerwinski
166 A. 388 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)
Coolidge v. Wiggin
62 Me. 568 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1873)
Kirschner v. Conklin
40 Conn. 77 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1873)
Smith v. Morrill
54 Me. 48 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1866)
Church v. Barlow
26 Mass. 547 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)