Talcot v. Commercial Insurance Co.
2 Johns. 467
Opinion
Here have been two trials in each of these causes, on the same question of fact. As four different juries have found that the vessel was seaworthy, and on the last trial, some further evidence was adduced, on the part of the plaintiff, we do not think it expedient to disturb the verdict. The rule must be denied.
Rule refused,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talcot v. Commercial Insurance Co., 2 Johns. 467 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
2 Johns. 467 (Talcot v. Commercial Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Estate of Randall
93 P.2d 1 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)
Dorwin v. Westbrook
11 A.D. 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Nichols v. Tuttle
12 N.Y.S. 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Osborn v. . Schenck
83 N.Y. 201 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Monarch G. & S. M. Co. v. McLaughlin
1 Idaho 650 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1877)
Fearing v. De Wolf
8 F. Cas. 1118 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1847)