Talbott v. Buffet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Talbott v. Buffet

46 S.W.3d 670, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 982

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 2001

DocketNo. ED 78717

StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.W.3d 670 (Talbott v. Buffet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talbott v. Buffet, 46 S.W.3d 670, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 982 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Talbott (Employee) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (LIRC or Commission) affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordering Employee’s Claim for Compensation stricken and dismissed and denying compensation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the decision of the LIRC is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Reese v. Gary & Roger Link, Inc., 5 S.W.3d 522, 525 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Talbott (Employee) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (LIRC or Commission) affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordering Employee’s Claim for Compensation stricken and dismissed and denying compensation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the decision of the LIRC is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Reese v. Gary & Roger Link, Inc., 5 S.W.3d 522, 525 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 S.W.3d 670, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talbott-v-buffet-moctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack