Talbott & Sons v. Collier

28 S.E. 225, 102 Ga. 550, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 547
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1897·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

1. When in a justice’s court it does not appear from the summons that the plaintiff had split his cause of action so as to bring the same within the jurisdiction of that court, an objection to the jurisdiction upon that ground can not be made by motion, but must be made by a plea to the jurisdiction, sworn to and filed in the first instance.

(a) In such a case; where no plea is filed in the first instance, an appeal after verdict waives any objection to the jurisdiction.

2. The entry of an appeal from a judgment rendered in a justice’s court and the subsequent trial of the case upon its merits, without objection to the sufficiency of the service, amount to a waiver of service in the first instance.

3. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, the judgment of the trial judge refusing to set it aside upon writ of certiorari will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talbott & Sons v. Collier, 28 S.E. 225, 102 Ga. 550, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 547 (Ga. 1897).

28 S.E. 225 (Talbott & Sons v. Collier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. First National Bank of Atlanta
233 S.E.2d 26 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Garrison v. McGuire
152 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Smith v. Pope
111 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Associates Discount Corp. v. Willard
108 S.E.2d 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Miller v. Wellborn
121 S.E. 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)