Talbot v. Goord

258 A.D.2d 954, 683 N.Y.S.2d 442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Talbot v. Goord. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D.2d 899

Opinions

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the administrative determination finding him guilty of smuggling, property loss or damage and failing to abide by facility correspondence procedures in violation of various prison disciplinary rules. Initially, the Attorney General concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support the charges of smuggling and property loss or damage. Accordingly, those charges must be annulled and all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. With respect to the charge of violating facility correspondence procedures, we need note only that petitioner pleaded guilty to such charge and, hence, is precluded from challenging it on substantial evidence grounds (see, Matter of Sparks v Coombe, 243 AD2d 767, 768).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talbot v. Goord, 258 A.D.2d 954, 683 N.Y.S.2d 442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

258 A.D.2d 954 (Talbot v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sparks v. Coombe
243 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)