Talbert v. State

829 S.W.2d 489, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 337, 1992 WL 37488
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1992·No. No. 60069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits following an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talbert v. State, 829 S.W.2d 489, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 337, 1992 WL 37488 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

829 S.W.2d 489 (Talbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.